> 36 million CSAM media removed in 2025?

No, not at all.

"removing over 36 million pieces of child sexual exploitation content last year"

Not CSAM.

Doesn’t the M stand for Material? What are you saying the difference is? Their quote just sounds like another phrasing

Facebook's policy conspicuously lacks any definition of CSAM.

> AI-generated

How on earth can they know?

> But every time I turn around, someone's claiming nobody gets any value from these tools

Really? I find agreement that gullible users get something they value, even if it is worthless.

I guess this was vibe-coded? The top three item are "AI"-driven content. And obviously so since each says AI in the very first para.

this is not vibe coded.

it is part of a much larger project than just this page (https://sprinklz.io), which I have been working on, on and off, for almost 4 years.

Current title: Anthropic AI used fake profiles to target people in hack - then hid the evidence

... and worse, it will diminish your ability to realise.

> Maybe people don't cite specific apps because they like their jobs, and outing apps as vibe-coded is still seen as negative

... or IDs apps as cr*p is still seen as negative.

> people just don't care apparently.

This is the target user of these chatbots.

> Because my friend didn’t have the vocabulary to ask the AI to write code.

Why did she even need that?

> “Please write to me an html page which does X, Y, Z.” But since she didn’t know the right terminology

No code there!